Investigations in the public interestEvidence. Enquiry. Accountability.
The Documents / D

Source note · Mark John Mayo v Miss E / L00BP152

The 6 May 2026 letter before action addressed to Nick Shackson

Estates Specialist, National Grid Electricity Distribution (South West) plc; Barnstaple, North Devon, in the 2024 correspondence · National Grid letter, October 2024 ↗

The family’s 6 May 2026 account of its concerns and its requests for explanations and supporting records.

DLetter before action6 PDF pagesSupplied PDF copy reviewed · 12 September 2026

What is in the file

The Unanswered Record has examined all 6 pages in this supplied PDF copy. Page references below refer to that copy.

The letter is dated 6 May 2026. It sets out the family’s position and the explanations it seeks.

  • Page 1: the date and purpose of the letter.
  • Page 2: the family’s challenge to the title-specific and general-area descriptions.
  • Pages 4–5: requests for the basis of the wording and identification of the agreements said to have been transferred, including whether any concerned BH68.

The reported office discussion

Page 3 attributes to an Estates Specialist identified as “Tom” a statement that no current or historic BH68 agreement existed in Mr Mayo’s name. The family also reports historic agreements it describes as defunct, a predecessor agreement for Miss E’s property and her current executed agreement. This is the family’s account of the discussion: the office recording and title/subdivision history are needed to test the reported account. Historic agreement copies have since been supplied separately.

Professional identification: Tom Watson · Estates and Wayleaves Specialist · National Grid Electricity Distribution (South West) plc · Bodmin, Cornwall is the public professional match linked to this account. The letter itself gives no surname for Tom; the profile distinguishes the public professional sources from the meeting account.

How to read it

A letter before action records the position of its author. The family’s assertions about events, intention and wrongdoing must be distinguished from facts independently established by other documents.

The letter is included in the source index because it shows how the requests for clarification developed. Its allegations are not adopted as findings by this draft.

Publication status

The original PDF is retained outside this website. This source note summarises the supplied copy and does not replace the document itself. A publication copy has not yet been prepared.

Read the related article

The plan-and-reply comparison · Reviewed 19 September 2026

The six-page letter is dated 6 May 2026. Pages 1–3 set out the family’s account and contrast the title wording with the general-area description; pages 4–5 request the basis, instruments, authorship, authorisations and explanation within seven days. Its account of the Bodmin discussion identifies an Estates Specialist called Tom. The separate covering email dated 6 May lists Appendices A–D; the 3 June header is an export date. Shackson’s quoted 5 May confirmation concerns Geldards’ instruction, not a substantive answer to the later notice.

Read the illustrated sequence and direct questions →

BH68 / Read the letters and the evidence

What was put to Shackson and Skea?

The 6 and 7 May 2026 letters before action and their evidence are now available as indexed downloads, checked against the original sent attachments. The source hub also records Geldards’ denial and Skea’s September representation letter, distinguishing those replies from the authentication and contractual-record questions.

Download the letters, examine the evidence and follow the replies →