Public-interest investigations · The Evans case
We stand beside Miss E and Mr J in demanding answers about their home, safety and treatment by public authorities. Read the allegation. Examine the evidence. Follow the response.
Lead investigation · costs and judicial accountability
Miss E’s letters challenge the £3,500 assessment and £1,750 payment. A later order refuses underlying N260 disclosure. Follow the questions to Paul Mitchell, Leslie Adrian Blohm and the solicitors asserting service.
Read the letters, orders and full investigation2 October 2026 / Sale interference
Mark John Mayo faces direct questions after the agent withdrew the home from marketing. Read the earlier warning, the agent’s letter and the Council complaint.
2 October 2026 / Paul Mitchell · Proportionality
Small claims was proposed. Multi-track followed. Read the affordability warnings, decisions and allegation of deliberate hardship.
The full chronology, allegation and eight questions · Our call for compensation and personal accountability
2 October 2026 / Alleged financial coercion
Miss E plans a claim against Mark John Mayo concerning alleged extortion and wrongful accusations. Follow the letter, joinder, costs demands, disputed accounts and reported harm.
2 October 2026 / Council accountability
Matthew Millichope’s assessment. Ian McIver’s relocation assurance. Phil Gilbert’s renewed-complaint response. Her nine-page March letter now puts the conflicting noise accounts and withheld-record questions before readers. Read her full letter and direct challenge.
The named allegations and questions · Full film, evidence, replies and context
Video record · reporting added 29 September 2026
Camera-date order, visible events and the family’s account of their impact. The correspondence shows who was told about Miss E’s concerns and what followed.
Enforcement · changing accounts
Compare the dated statements, correspondence and records behind the questions to Claire Louise Sandbrook, Shergroup and Sherwins.
Police and Council · appeal record
Miss E challenges the five-year notice and the independence of the process. Follow the correspondence, evidence and named questions.
Named questions · documented responsibility
These are entry points into the questions, not a ranking of guilt. Each record distinguishes the family’s allegations, the documents, recorded replies and requests not yet sent.
The costs decision
Designated Civil Judge · Cornwall, Devon & Dorset
Which N260 or other costs material supported the amounts imposed on Miss E after the 10 March 2025 hearing?
COSTS-01 · Historical request · record gap
The refusal of costs disclosure
Senior Circuit Judge · Designated Civil Judge · Bristol
Why refuse the underlying N260 disclosure—and how was Miss E to test the calculation of the costs being enforced?
IN-02 · Proposed publication question
The judgment, evidence & alleged bias
Timothy Edmund Walsh · Circuit Judge · Western Circuit, Exeter
What evidence supported the conclusion on the scale of felling challenged by Mr J—and where were the photographs and reported tractor collision reconciled with the access outcome?
FOR-08 · Proposed publication question
The disputed court evidence
Solicitor & Partner · Seldons LLP, Bideford, Devon · Individual SRA 664668
Why self-forward the disputed emails? Where are the originals, and where was any editing disclosed before reliance in court?
BH68-08 · Proposed publication question
Firm-level accountability
Solicitors · Bideford, Devon · Firm SRA 570661
After the firm was put on notice, who checked the originals—and where is its reasoned review?
BH68-10 · Proposed publication question
The writ and issuing office
High Court Enforcement Officer · Shergroup
How did the writ reach the wrong issuing office—and what documents and checks supported enforcement?
ENF-05 · Proposed publication question
Browse the concise accountability register · Read the full evidence and response record
Begin with the family’s safety concerns, dated images, machinery photographs and forestry correspondence.
The agreement, attributed emails, plans and boundary evidence.
The assessment, requests for documents and later refusal.
Trace the court filings, Annex E, Cornwell’s replies, the firm’s position and the SRA’s assessment.
Planning, heritage and sale concerns.
The judgment challenge and filed appeal.
Read the Blohm order, Miss E’s five protective appeal grounds, her formal response and the requests for independent determination.
Compare the Mayo–police correspondence, Council involvement, notice and Miss E’s appeal with the questions for the named decision-makers.
Changing orders, bank restrictions, writs and enforcement.
Watch the dated recordings, then follow the conveyance wording, written complaints, injury report and responses from the lawyers and court.
Watch Miss E’s account, compare the Council’s readings, follow the commercial-shooting account and read the questions to Walsh and the Council.
Compare the pre-sale answers, the letter before action and the sellers’ reply with the prior-dispute recording, shooting history and conveyance obligations.
The public interest
A person should not have to risk their home and savings simply to have serious concerns examined. Our reporting follows the evidence and asks those exercising power to account for their decisions.
Review the documents, support requests for answers and submit a comment for editorial approval.
Receive case updates · Read the monthly edition · Send evidence or a documented response
Home life / Public protection / Accountability
A pensioner in tears. Noise recorded inside her home. Read the direct challenge to Timothy Edmund Walsh’s findings in the supplied transcript, Torridge’s response and the fourteen demands for answers.
Watch the full film and read the context · Named questions and recorded replies