59 recipients across BH68, costs, planning, forestry, Annex E and the SRA record. Each entry identifies the recipient’s role and the questions addressed to them.
No matching entries. Try fewer words or clear the filters.
1 questions
Chambers publishing Jack Webb’s professional profile and its entry for L00BP152.
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
3 questions
National Grid Wayleave Services; Bodmin, Cornwall, in the attributed April 2024 email signature · Attributed April 2024 signature
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Director, Forest Services, Forestry Commission; corporate correspondence office in Bristol · Official executive-board listing ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Regulator of barristers in England and Wales · conduct assessment and investigation questions
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
4 questions
HMCTS civil administration at Barnstaple Magistrates’, County and Family Court · North Walk, Barnstaple · court code 119
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
4 questions
Police Constable · Devon and Cornwall Police · PC 18754 in the correspondence · Torrington / Holsworthy, Devon
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
4 questions
SRA firm 599486; LLP OC385432; registered office Barnstaple and transaction correspondence office Bideford, Devon. Asked to authenticate the field-purchase records
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
HMCTS High Court and civil administration · Bristol District Registry · 2 Redcliff Street, Bristol
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Named by Seldons as HDI Global’s agents; Gary Oldroyd identified as the contact
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
17 questions
Authorised High Court Enforcement Officer, Shergroup; identified in the 10 March 2026 order · Shergroup authorised-officer identification ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Operations Admin Officer, Forestry Commission England, Operational Delivery Team, Kennford, Exeter, in his August 2024 reply · Dated Forestry Commission reply
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
11 questions
Chartered surveyor, Vickery Holman; author of the 23 June 2025 boundary report DV/113701 in L00BP152
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
5 questions
Police evidence, supervision and safeguarding · Torrington and Holsworthy, Devon
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Police Sergeant · Devon and Cornwall Police · PS 18490, Torrington & Holsworthy Beat Sergeant, on the August 2024 warning
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
HMCTS court administration · Southernhay Gardens, Exeter · court code 198 · Barnstaple–Exeter management connection identified in the correspondence
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
7 questions
Forestry inspection, licence record and Annex E report-scope questions
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Firm named by the operator in its representation reply.
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Insurer name supplied by Seldons on 9 January 2026; exact underwriting entity and policy requested
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Planning Manager, Torridge District Council, Bideford, Devon; confirmed in the April 2026 record · Official committee pack, April 2026 ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
3 questions
Woodland Officer, Forestry Commission, South West; regional office at Kennford, Exeter · Official woodland-officer map, August 2026 ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
24 questions
Designated Civil Judge for Cornwall, Devon and Dorset; Exeter Combined Court Centre · Judiciary leadership directory ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
- COSTS-01Mitchell: what record supported the costs assessment?Court costs · Historical enquiry · record gap identified
- COSTS-02When was the costs statement filed—and when was Miss E given it?Court costs · Historical enquiry · record gap identified
- COSTS-03How were the £3,500 and £1,750 figures reached?Court costs · Historical enquiry · record gap identified
- COSTS-04Where are the reasons for the costs decision?Court costs · Historical enquiry · record gap identified
- COSTS-05Why do the costs-record requests remain unresolved?Court costs · Historical enquiry · record gap identified
- FOR-08Where did the court reconcile the photographs, the collision and the access outcome?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-13What happened to the request to test the report and review the injunction?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CF-02Where were the specific objections addressed?Court filing record · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- JUD-01Honour requires integrity. Where is the record supporting the costs?Judicial accountability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- IN-08What calculation supported £3,500—and £1,750 against Miss E?Independent appeal scrutiny · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-06What record supports the £1,750—and what answered the disclosure request?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-14Why remove joint instruction—and what protected the contrary evidence?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-15Which direction prevented representations, and how did you apply it?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-16Produce the foundations of both decisions—not one disputed outcome as an answer to the other.Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-21What effective opportunity existed to present and challenge the evidence?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- TPDO-07Keep the awards separate. Show the foundation for each.TPDO hearing & judicial treatment · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-16Paul Mitchell: if the injury report reached you, what followed?Reported injury & April response · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-07What justified joinder and the scope of the amended case?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-01Small claims was proposed. What justified multi-track?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-02Where was the assessment of affordability and participation?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-03Which procedural benefits justified the cost?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-04An ADR stay was ordered. What happened when it did not resolve the case?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-05The April warning predicted financial harm. Where is the substantive answer?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-06Answer the allegation of deliberate hardship and coordinated pressure.Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
25 questions
Circuit Judge, Western Circuit; appointed to Exeter Law Courts on 27 June 2022 · Official judicial appointment ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
37 questions
Court administration and order integrity · Barnstaple, Exeter, Bristol and London · senior management, complaints and Counter Fraud
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Bank responding to the October 2025 interim third-party debt order
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
10 questions
Community Safety & Public Health Lead Officer, Torridge District Council, in the June 2026 correspondence · Bideford, Devon
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
professionally Jack Webb; barrister, 3PB, Bristol; called to the Bar in 2016 · Bar Standards Board register ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
4 questions
Performance and Monitoring Team Leader, Torridge District Council, Bideford, Devon, in the July 2025 response · July 2025 Council correspondence
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
9 questions
Civil, Family and Tribunals Delivery Manager, Barnstaple and Exeter Courts, in the 2025–2026 court correspondence · Dated court correspondence and source record
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Judicial personal-conduct complaints; questions about the proper route for assessing the recorded language and manner, distinct from an appeal against a decision
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
High Court of Justice · administrative filing and issue office · Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
7 questions
SRA Investigation Officer who signed the 30 October 2025 decision · Dated SRA decision and correspondence
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
7 questions
Senior Circuit Judge and Designated Civil Judge, Bristol; appointed to the Western Circuit in October 2022 · Official judicial appointment ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
52 questions
solicitor and partner, Seldons LLP, Bideford, Devon; individual SRA 664668 · SRA individual register ↗
Seldons contact named in the forwarded correspondence.
Questions across all reporting strands
- BH68-04Why rely on this plan—and where is the agreement?BH68 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- BH68-08Why self-forward the disputed email—and what verifies it?BH68 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AE-02If the emails were edited, where was that disclosed?Annex E · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AE-06Where is the document trail behind the wider allegations?Annex E · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-06How was the officer’s impression presented to the court?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-07Where is the response to the chain and machinery challenge?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-15What did each representative know—and how was the photographic challenge answered?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-16Answer the risk—not just the person raising it.Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CF-03Which evidence answers the objections copied to you?Court filing record · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- DR-01Which document establishes the rights claimed for BH67 and BH68?Post-hearing disclosure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- DR-02What check established that the replacement printouts preserved the original emails?Post-hearing disclosure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-01Which claim was the court deciding?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-02A boundary-only joinder—or liability for the entire dispute?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-05The photographs demanded an answer. Where is it?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-06A right of access. What happened to the safeguards?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-07BH68: where is the instrument supporting the competing entitlement?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-09The £120,000 transaction: show the verifiable chain.Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-10Whose costs, for which issues, from what date?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- IN-07If the N260 was sent, where is the original transmission?Independent appeal scrutiny · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- IN-09The £300 fee: where are the filing and payment records?Independent appeal scrutiny · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CPN-07What was the solicitor’s role in the ASB route?CPN · Police & Council · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-01If the N260 was sent, produce that email and its attachment.Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-10Who authorised refusal while proposing further enforcement?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-11What file evidence supported the precise service assertion?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- WRIT-08Mayo offered to arrange resending. Where is the N260?Writ provenance & registry · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-02The instruction letter acknowledged Miss E’s agreement. Was it enclosed?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-05Authenticate the email before it is used to support a boundary claim.Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-06Which plan reached the expert—and what was it said to prove?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-10When the integrity objections arrived, what did you check?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-11Where is the documentary route from the claimed pole rights to the claimed land?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-15Which direction prevented representations, and how did you apply it?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-16Produce the foundations of both decisions—not one disputed outcome as an answer to the other.Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-18What justified continued reliance after the limitations were challenged?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-20Was her express objection accurately represented?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FT-02Who supplied the statements to Seldons—and where is the original email?Field transfer & completion statements · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FT-05What was changed between the source files and the court copies?Field transfer & completion statements · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FT-07Will you authenticate the bank page and explain the address?Field transfer & completion statements · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- TPDO-02Why leave on the hearing date—and return two days later?TPDO hearing & judicial treatment · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- TPDO-03If the sending time is known, where are the email and N260?TPDO hearing & judicial treatment · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- SB-06After notice of the missing N260, what did each of you check?Shergroup accounts & stay handling · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-01Cornwell: justify the pressure, not merely the client’s position.CCTV & solicitor accountability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-09Cornwell and Seldons: what did you put before counsel?CCTV & barrister accountability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-13Cornwell: where was the reported injury considered?Reported injury & April response · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-12Seldons and Cornwell: show when and how you notified the insurer.Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-15Preserve the notification trail. What was actually put before the insurer?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-01The house was expressly in view. What justified the pursuit?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-02What liability existed—not simply what total was demanded?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-03If the funding is conditional, what costs remain recoverable?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-04Why was financial verification refused?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-05Who received the legal services—and why was VAT recoverable from Miss E?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-08Who checked the costs presentation and the admitted grading error?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-08What proportionate route did the claimant’s solicitors propose?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
professionally Mark Hacking; solicitor and partner, Geldards LLP, Nottingham; individual SRA 156301 · SRA individual register ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
38 questions
claimant in L00BP152; Higher Barley Hayes, Torrington area, Devon · Case identity and source record
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
6 questions
Environmental Protection and Community Safety Team Leader, Torridge District Council, in the 15 March 2024 noise assessment · 15 March 2024 Council assessment
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
5 questions
Questions about the publisher’s precise legal identity, Mark John Mayo’s role and any involvement in litigation payments.
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Justice policy and proposed accountability reform—not accused of the underlying conduct
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
neighbouring farmer identified in Miss E and Mr J’s account of the tractor collision · Reported collision and case account
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
5 questions
Company named in the executed wayleave agreement.
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
4 questions
Deputy District Judge who heard the 10 December 2025 third-party debt order proceedings at Barnstaple; identified by his introduction in the hearing transcript · 10 December 2025 hearing transcript, page 2; approved judgment
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
5 questions
Estates Specialist, National Grid Electricity Distribution (South West) plc; Barnstaple, North Devon, in the 2024 correspondence · National Grid letter, October 2024 ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
10 questions
Former seller of Lower Barley Hayes; joint respondent in the sale-disclosure correspondence · Seller information and July 2025 correspondence
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
5 questions
Principal Planning Officer, Torridge District Council, Bideford, Devon; identified in the 2025 planning record · Official appeal decision, February 2025 ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
3 questions
Public Health and Community Safety Manager, Torridge District Council, in the December 2024 correspondence · December 2024 Council correspondence
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
District Judge, South West; appointed 30 January 2017 · Official district-judge directory ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Chief Executive, Forestry Commission; Bristol correspondence office · Official government profile ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
12 questions
Former seller of Lower Barley Hayes; witness statement signed 14 March 2025 · Seller information and signed witness statement
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Conservation Officer, Torridge District Council, Bideford, Devon, in the 2024–2025 records · Official scrutiny pack, February 2025 ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
55 questions
Firm connected with Luke Cornwell and the disputed material; asked for a firm-level review.
Questions across all reporting strands
- BH68-04Why rely on this plan—and where is the agreement?BH68 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- BH68-08Why self-forward the disputed email—and what verifies it?BH68 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- BH68-10What does Seldons stand behind—and what did it check?BH68 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AE-01Receipt is recorded. What happened next?Annex E · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AE-04What did the expert actually receive?Annex E · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AE-05Can the disputed schedules be reconciled line by line?Annex E · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AE-06Where is the document trail behind the wider allegations?Annex E · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-06How was the officer’s impression presented to the court?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-07Where is the response to the chain and machinery challenge?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-15What did each representative know—and how was the photographic challenge answered?Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FOR-16Answer the risk—not just the person raising it.Forestry & access · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CF-04Who reviewed the allegations for the firm?Court filing record · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- DR-01Which document establishes the rights claimed for BH67 and BH68?Post-hearing disclosure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- DR-02What check established that the replacement printouts preserved the original emails?Post-hearing disclosure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- DR-03Who answered the specific objections after the documents arrived?Post-hearing disclosure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-01Which claim was the court deciding?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-02A boundary-only joinder—or liability for the entire dispute?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-05The photographs demanded an answer. Where is it?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-06A right of access. What happened to the safeguards?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-07BH68: where is the instrument supporting the competing entitlement?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-09The £120,000 transaction: show the verifiable chain.Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- AP-10Whose costs, for which issues, from what date?Judgment challenge · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- IN-07If the N260 was sent, where is the original transmission?Independent appeal scrutiny · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- IN-09The £300 fee: where are the filing and payment records?Independent appeal scrutiny · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- IN-10Reconcile the writ total with the orders and issuing record.Independent appeal scrutiny · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CPN-07What was the solicitor’s role in the ASB route?CPN · Police & Council · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-01If the N260 was sent, produce that email and its attachment.Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-04Which order reached Miss E—and when?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-10Who authorised refusal while proposing further enforcement?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-11What file evidence supported the precise service assertion?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- ENF-16Which version reached each recipient—and what was corrected afterwards?Costs enforcement & N260 · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- WRIT-08Mayo offered to arrange resending. Where is the N260?Writ provenance & registry · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-02The instruction letter acknowledged Miss E’s agreement. Was it enclosed?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-10When the integrity objections arrived, what did you check?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-16Produce the foundations of both decisions—not one disputed outcome as an answer to the other.Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-18What justified continued reliance after the limitations were challenged?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- VENN-20Was her express objection accurately represented?Venn report & BH68 evidence · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FT-02Who supplied the statements to Seldons—and where is the original email?Field transfer & completion statements · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FT-05What was changed between the source files and the court copies?Field transfer & completion statements · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FT-07Will you authenticate the bank page and explain the address?Field transfer & completion statements · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- TPDO-02Why leave on the hearing date—and return two days later?TPDO hearing & judicial treatment · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- TPDO-03If the sending time is known, where are the email and N260?TPDO hearing & judicial treatment · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- SB-06After notice of the missing N260, what did each of you check?Shergroup accounts & stay handling · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-02Seldons: who supervised the response to a vulnerable opponent?CCTV & solicitor accountability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-09Cornwell and Seldons: what did you put before counsel?CCTV & barrister accountability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CCTV-14Seldons: justify the communication restriction and police warning.Reported injury & April response · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-12Seldons and Cornwell: show when and how you notified the insurer.Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-15Preserve the notification trail. What was actually put before the insurer?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-01The house was expressly in view. What justified the pursuit?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-02What liability existed—not simply what total was demanded?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-03If the funding is conditional, what costs remain recoverable?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-04Why was financial verification refused?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-05Who received the legal services—and why was VAT recoverable from Miss E?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- FUND-08Who checked the costs presentation and the admitted grading error?Litigation funding & financial pressure · Proposed · not sent by this publication
- CM-08What proportionate route did the claimant’s solicitors propose?Case management, proportionality & vulnerability · Proposed · not sent by this publication
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
17 questions
Enforcement organisation and legal service named in Claire Louise Sandbrook’s March 2026 statements; N293A preparation and Central Office submission
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
8 questions
SRA-regulated law firm, SRA 510565; N293A preparation and submission identified in Sandbrook’s 8 March 2026 statement
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
29 questions
Regulatory assessment and handling questions
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
2 questions
Solicitor, SRA 146856; Conveyancing & Property, Brewer Harding & Rowe Solicitors LLP, Bideford, Devon; named on the 5 April 2024 completion letter
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
3 questions
The Council team responsible for identifying the author and basis of the heritage advice
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
22 questions
Planning service and complaints / enforcement management · CPN decision-making, community safety and statutory-noise investigation
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Legislative scrutiny and proposed reform—not an appeal body or accused party
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
1 questions
Surveying firm identified on Venn’s report; respondent to Miss E’s July 2025 public review
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
6 questions
Chief Executive, National Grid plc, since November 2025; group executive office in London · National Grid leadership biography ↗
Questions across all reporting strands
Show only questions addressed to this recipient →
