The question · editorial wording
Did you personally draw the plan sent to Mr Mayo on 28 April 2025? If not, who prepared it?
Why this matters Traceability
A plan should be traceable to its author and source material. That allows its reliability and limitations to be checked. Identify who prepared the plan, as well as who sent it.
Current question directed to: Nick Shackson · Estates Specialist · National Grid
- Recipient of the related request in the supplied record
- Nick Shackson
- Related request in record
- 13 February 2026
- Sending of a new request by this publication
- Not recorded; this is the draft reporting register.
Personal-authorship question recorded in Document B, pp. 2–3; chased on 24 February.
What the record answers
The 2 February reply confirms sending the email and plan. Who prepared it?
The point still requiring clarification
Miss E asked about personal authorship on 13 February 2026. The earlier reply confirms sending the plan, which is a different point. No direct answer to the later authorship question appears in the supplied bundle.
Related material reviewed through 7 May 2026; no later direct answer established.
Where this question comes from
Nick Shackson, National Grid and the BH68 plan → Read the originating article
Supporting source notes: B, pp. 2–3.
Other parties mentioned
Keep the record complete
Answer this question.
Any party with a response, correction or relevant document can contact theunansweredrecord@gmail.com. Quote BH68-01 and identify the point and evidence you are addressing. Material replies will be considered and reflected fairly alongside the question.
Respond to BH68-01 ↗